2023 - November and December

 November 2023

1 - The BBC announces that the entire back catalogue of extant Doctor Who episodes are available for free on iPlayer. Fans note that some episodes appear to be missing (eg. The Abominable Snowmen, episode 1). (Note: iPlayer is not available outside of the UK.)

2 - The BBC announces it will make available a cut-down and colourised version of The Daleks as part of the 60th anniversary celebrations.

3 - On MEF, member John Green shares an announcement from Film is Fabulous - that among other things they will be announcing finds of "lost children's programmes from the 1960s". Could this include missing Who?

Meanwhile it's announced that the newly-colourised version of The Daleks will be shown on BBC4 on the anniversary date at 7:30pm

13 - On MEF, Paul Vanezis announces that that a second instalment of 1970s Basil Brush has been returned, thanks to the Film is Fabulous initiative.

On GB, Tim Burrows claims it was an "ex-BBC guy" who returned the print.

Meanwhile, in an article published by TV Tonight, Mark Stuckey calls for an "amnesty" for film collectors to be immune from legal action should they attempt to return missing BBC material.

14 - After some discussion on GB as to whether the 60th anniversary in 10 days will hold any surprises,  Scot Ferre posts that he has "heard" something that hints about a possible return but it has been passed down a chain so he won't say anything further.

20 - On GB, Richard Bignell posts a fascinating screengrab of the memo that first tipped off him and the other missing episode hunters as regards the involvement of T.I.E. in the overseas sales of Doctor Who.

21 - After surprisingly few rumblings leading up to the 60th anniversary, on GB member Zippy posts that Ian Levine has revealed that Jeremy Bentham told him there will be a "missing episode announcement" this Thursday. (Ian has apparently deleted all Tweets and posts regarding this, so there is no direct link.)

However on his Facebook group, Ian says he "doesn't believe it for a minute".

22 - Further to this, member Scot Ferre says it could be "multiple episodes of a story".

The heat continues on GB, with member chris1973 saying a Facebook friend of his told him it could be "multiple" episodes of a story to he revealed.

Meanwhile, Phil McGill casually drops into the conversation that tomorrow we will all be watching The Tenth Planet episode 4!

23 - The midnight mark passes with no announcement made - but as posters on GB point out, no-one of note has been in to debunk the rumour, which is normally standard procedure in these cases.

Member chris1973 cheekily suggests that if he were making an announcement, he might time it to the original episode's broadcast time of 5:15pm!

But unfortunately, the 60th passes without any news on missing episodes.

24 - On GB, Douglas Wulf enigmatically posts that "perhaps we won't have so long to wait". Doug posts something similar on PMF.

The Independent publishes an article about missing episodes featuring quotes from Paul Vanezis, stating that finding missing episodes of television is a by-product of helping to catalogue people's film collections.

26 - On GB, Andora mentions that in 'Secrets and Scandals', a Channel 5 documentary where missing episodes were mentioned, actor Mark Strickson (Turlough) apparently conducted his own search in Sierra Leone while recording a wildlife documentary! 

Meanwhile on PMF, Doug Wulf keeps up the enigmatic posting - when replying to another member as to his thinking, Doug responds:

"You have a very, very easy way of finding out, but I'll leave that to you.

You'll understand shortly."

Could this be a reference to one of the end of year specials, entitled "The Giggle", in which the (Celestial) Toymaker is set to return?

28 - 29 - Doug makes a series of optimistic posts on PMF, in particular this post, explaining why he feels optimistic for the future of missing episodes.

December 2023

2 - On PMF, Scot Ferre says if he was a "betting man" he would bet on a return announcement this month, tying into the return of the Toymaker. Doug Wulf agrees with him.

On GB, dr caligari points out that during the Hartnell montage at the end of the colourised showing of The Daleks, at one point there appears to be a shot of William Hartnell dressed as the Abbot of Amboise from the completely missing story The Massacre. Other posters claim it is a doctored (no pun intended) shot of Hartnell from an existing episode of The Crusade.

3 - On PMF, Scot says that it is only a "guess" on his part that the return of the Toymaker is impetus for a recovery.

Missing Believed Wiped is held at BFI Southbank. The only mention of Doctor Who is that David Stead, who formerly returned an episode of The Wheel in Space, returned an episode of comedy series  "Them".

4 - On PMF, Scot Ferre says he read on a website there was "more returned material" which will be shown at special extra MBW event next year. However, Miss Cathcart says that Dick Fiddy alluded to the Film is Fabulous finds being screened at a later date.

8 - On the official Doctor Who Twitter, it's announced that The Celestial Toymaker will be released "soon" with its missing episodes animated.

12 - On PMF, member iamyourservant posts a reply received from Philip Morris on the DWMEFB Group:

"Hi Tony no not at present.Unfortunately there are no guarantees.The task is not an easy one which is why nobody else despite all talk and rumours has moved the dial forward since my last returned dr who recovery."

The member points out the phrasing used by Morris is potentially telling: "since my last returned dr who recovery".

13 - On Twitter, Ian Levine shares a screengrab of a Facebook post by Philip Morris, in which Morris says episode 3 of The Web of Fear is in the hands of "a vocal fan". In a rebuttal post, Levine says Morris is "full of shit".

16 - And rounding out the year with a visit back to Digital Spy Forums (DSF) - member Sambda quotes a reply from Philip Morris on Facebook, when asked for an update on finds of missing Who:

"Hi Tony no not at present.Unfortunately there are no guarantees.The task is not an easy one which is why nobody else despite all talk and rumours has moved the dial forward since my last returned dr who recovery."

Final message for 2023

OK readers, well that was the year that was. The 60th has come and gone, no further returns have happened but hope springs eternal. Many questions - at least in my mind - remain to be answered.

Has Philip Morris' involvement in missing episodes changed the game forever? Will we see any more returns this side of the 70th? Will Film is Fabulous come up trumps and bring us some pleasant surprises in 2024?

Time alone will tell, but in the meantime I want to wish my readers a happy and enjoyable Christmas season and a blessed and prosperous 2024. 

Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning, Part 1 - Review and Opinion

Branching out a bit here, as I finally watched this yesterday for the first time and felt moved to comment. 

I had deliberately held off as, despite having taken this series to my heart particularly from Ghost Protocol onward, I had immediate reservations about this film. From the off, Hayley Atwell - whom elsewhere I adore - did not seem to be a match for this particular franchise. Even from seeing the posters - where she is the second largest character featured - I just wasn't feeling it. Also, I wasn't enamoured of the central conceit of the main enemy being a disembodied computer intelligence - again, it seemed a total mismatch for this kind of visceral and very human series.

Firstly, make no mistake - I LOVE these films. The Mission series has evolved into one of the very best, and has thoroughly earned its place in my affections. The characters, the stories, the action, the sheer amount of hard graft that goes into them from Tom and all concerned is staggering and greatly appreciated. It's unquestionably one of my all-time favourite film series: the last three films in particular have felt like movie-making perfection. But, having now watched M:I 7, I can  see that my initial concerns were not only justified, but they were magnified. There appear to be major scripting and plotting problems, not to mention very underdeveloped characterisation. 

Firstly, and in a general sense, one comes away from this film without the sense of charm and likeability that go hand in hand with films 4 through 6. Fallout was a bit too self-important and grandiose at first blush, but due to the high stakes and with the excellent action, characters and storytelling, and particularly that lovely ending featuring a lighter moment between Ilsa and Ethan, I was fully prepared to let that be. Dead Reckoning has less of the self-importance factor, but crucially, there's none of the warmth and humour that make the preceding three films so likeable. Tom has barely any scenes with his castmates from the previous films, let alone any of substance. (Is Cruise doing a Vin Diesel?) The scenes he does have with them are dour and humourless, but this brings me to his scenes with Hayley Atwell.

I'm sorry - I just can't buy Atwell as this notorious, international thief and grand larcenist. She's utterly unconvincing as a master criminal. Not only does she have zero chemistry with Cruise, Grace just seems like some whimsical pickpocket who suddenly gets caught up in something out of her league. And she's an out and out coward - at the first sign of trouble, she runs away from every situation. It just doesn't seem to wash from a practical standpoint - how on earth has she remained at large? Also she doesn't trust Ethan - in crisis situations, she acts liked a frightened animal. I concede that she has a few good moments, but they simply aren't enough to justify her inclusion in the film.

Despite this, they seem to be setting up Grace as the next Ethan Hunt, at one point even dressing her similarly in grey suit vest and pants. They've even brought Pom Klementieff's character into the fold, leaving her alive at the film's end so that she can also be recruited by Kitteridge (as stated on the Wikipedia page for the next film). Are they trying to set up an all female IMF team? If so, they're going about it in the same ham-fisted and inept way we've seen other all-female teams go in recent years.

This brings me however to Pom Klementieff's character, and if anyone deserves to be recruited to the IMF, it's her. She is terrifying in this film; she's relentless, ruthless and a fantastic fighter. She's a nightmare, coming at Ethan in the night in that clown-like makeup in the narrow alley. If anything, the writers should have omitted Hayley Atwell's character completely, given her dialogue, motivation and scenes to Ilsa, and made Paris the one who comes over to the IMF. This would have been so much more satisfying and would have made so much sense as a character arc and from a plot perspective; but as Grace's arc, it pales in comparison to what could have been.

And this is only one aspect of the scripting problems - if the two halves of the key are under the ice of the Arctic shelf, how on earth are they retrieved? Surely the Russians knew where their sub went down, unless of course the Entity fed them false readings. But in that case who exactly retrieved them and how? And how did they then get into the hands of an anonymous courier and indeed Grace? It's never explained. 

Anyone who had the resources and knowledge to locate and retrieve the key surely would also have known that this is where the Sevastopol sunk and would simply have then gone on to access the submarine and win the race. Game over. However as this is a two part film, I'm willing to concede that we may get our answers in the next instalment.

Speaking of the Sevastopol, though, this entire sequence should have been told in flashback. We did not need to spend the first 10 minutes or so with characters we're not invested in: we had to wait so many years to see our favourite characters again it should opened with at least one of them, especially considering we will have such little quality interaction between them throughout the film. We could have started with Ilsa acquiring her half of the key and killing the courier (which is shown anyway later in flashback), establishing that the stakes are serious indeed. Ethan's mission scene should have come next, giving an explanation for what we'd just seen. Then, realising something was off with his mission instructions (he is told not to concern himself with the key's purpose but Ethan immediately smells a rat), we then get the US Intelligence briefing scene with the Sevastopol flashback incorporated, and Ethan arrives and gets the real skinny on what's going on.

This movie introduces us to two other new characters - both of whom make their debut in flashback, and in hitherto unwitnessed and unknown events prior to the start of the entire series! We are told basically nothing about Marie, Ethan's apparent love interest from back then, and in the course of the film we're really told not much more about Gabriel. Who is he? What is his background and his motivation in working for the entity? Why does Ilsa refer to him as some "Dark Messiah of Death"? None of this is explained or clarified, and while Esai Morales does a brilliant job with his portrayal of this utterly sadistic and amoral character, and is also a beast of a fighter, his motivations are muddy at best.

I mentioned Ilsa above, and I believe that killing her off will come to be seen as a grave mistake by the writing team. To rewind somewhat - I loved Paula Patton in Ghost Protocol: I thought she brought such a genuine warmth, power and likeability to the series. I was gutted when she wasn't brought back for Rogue Nation. At first, I found Rebecca Ferguson's portrayal in that film to be a bit cold and  bordering on pretentious, but I gradually warmed up to her and have taken her to my heart. I am a big Ilsa fan, not to mention Ferguson herself. When you see her in interviews, she is hilarious, an absolute riot. And as I said above, if only she had been the one seeking the key, and the one Ethan was due to intercept at the airport, that would been so much more satisfying from both a narrative and character point of view, rather than having to accept a slew of new unsatisfyingly developed characters.

Even the stunts in this film are somewhat underwhelming. The car chase sequence in Rome is inferior to the Moroccan version in Rogue Nation: there's barely any thrill factor. Ethan being handcuffed to Grace is presumably supposed to be funny, but it falls embarrassingly flat - the humour is microscopically doled out as if with an eyedropper. The scenes with the yellow Fiat is just not funny and not needed. 

Even the much-publicised, much vaunted centre-piece cliff jump doesn't read all that well on screen, diluting its effectiveness. I mean, you can tell it's an insane thing for Cruise to have done (eight times over, no less!) and it is spectacular, but overall for some reason it comes across as understated. (Which I know is saying a lot, considering the preparation that went into it and the personal risk to Cruise, but I couldn't help feel this way as a moviegoer.) Having said that, though, the sequence on the train as its carriages fall one by one into the ravine is jaw-droppingly intense, very effective indeed. It's the most credible sequence in the whole film, with the alley fight coming in second.

In summary, overall I enjoyed this film but I am glad I waited, as it left me with some serious concerns and a lot of unanswered questions. It's vexing to have to wait until part 2 to get those answers, assuming they are forthcoming (especially as it's now been delayed until May 2025!). I'm afraid that in common with every other formerly great franchise of late (Who, Trek, Bond, etc), with Fallout we may have seen our last truly great M:I film. Time will tell.